> Home> About SANet> ContactLanguage:  
Sustainable Alternatives NetworkGuiding business innovation with cleaner technologyUnited Nations Environment ProgrammeGlobal Environment Facility

Username: 
Password:  Forgot password?
 
Recirculation of Pickle Baths in the leather-tanning sector
Expert: Thad Mermer
Country: Spain
Organization:
Status:
Type of technology:
Submitted:

INTRODUCTION
The company took part in a European demonstration project for the extensive introduction of cleaner technologies, conservation of raw materials and optimization of the production process in the tanning industry. The company does double-faced leather curing for makers of sheepskin clothing. In the pickling process, the skins used to be introduced into four mixing tubs where they were treated with a mixture of formic acid, sulphuric acid and salt, which was dissolved in 12m3 (15.7 cubic yards) of water per tub and process. When the process was finished, the pickling liquor was drained from the bottom of the tubs, creating acid wastewater containing particles in suspension and oil and fat residual, which was put through a final sewage treatment process before its disposal.

 
FINANCIAL DETAILS
Investment Amount: US $72,229
Estimated Time to Recover Investment: 24 month(s)
Estimated Life Cycle of the Investment: 10 years
Finance Sources: Commercial Debt

TECHNOLOGY
Technology Used:
The technology used involved the addition of a filtration process and a storage tank where the recovered pickling liquor was captured and adjusted for reinsertion into the process. About half of the recovered liquor is reusable using this process. Treatment of the resultant waste was facilitated through the elimination of sulphuric acid, substituting formic acid in its place.
Technology Provider:

TECHNOLOGY FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS:
Technical feasability analysis:
Technical assessment:
Economic feasability analysis:
Economic assessment:
Environmental feasability analysis:
Environmental assessment:

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
Benefits: Reduced Water Pollutants
Details:
Water use: reduced by half, from 12,000 l (3,120 U.S. gallons) to 6,000 l (1,560 U.S. gallons); Sulfuric acid: eliminated; Salt use: reduced by half, from 1,000 kg (2,204 pounds) to 500 kg (1,102 pounds); Effluent: reduction of chlorides, conductivity and soluble salts.

MORE INFORMATION
Web: http://www.cema-sa.org
Contact: Esther Monfa cleanpro@cema-sa.org

DID YOU FIND THIS CASESTUDY USEFULL?
 
Home  |  Terms of Use  |  Contact
The Sustainable Alternatives Network is a joint initiative of the United Nations Environment Programme and the Global Environment Facility.
©2000-2010 UNEP/GEF. All rights reserved.